Foundations Microeconomic the Building .,E.M Porter 1.
.A Claros-Lopez and .,K Schwab .,E.M Porter ,Index nessCompetitive Business the from Findings :Prosperity of
2005-2006, Report Competitiveness Global The ,).Eds(
,York New ,Forum Economic World ,Macmillan Palgrave
of effect The .,M Farrokhi and .,Z Amiri .,A Esfahani Nasr 2.
with innovation organizational the on marketing internal
company Emersan (efficacy-self staff of role mediating the
27-45, 6, ,Development Entrepreneurship ,)study case a as
entrepreneurial of role The .,T.G Lumpink and .G Dess 3.
2005. 19,147-156, .,Exec .Manage .Acad ,shipentrepreneur corporate effective stimulating in orientation
,(System Entrepreneurship and Economics (trepreneurshipEn of Theory ..,K.M Nasiri and .M Dariani Ahmdpoor 4.
,capacity innovation SME .,J Ferreria and .C.S Marques 5.
.,Innovat .Manage .Technol .J ,Portugal of region dustrialin traditiona a in performance and advantage competitive
2009. 53-68, 4,
.,Econ .Bus Small ,growt business small of model tegrativein an Building .,A.D Shepherd and .,H Patzelt .,J Wiklund 6.
2009. 351-374, 32,
.,Econ .Prod .J .Int ,Performance Firm on Types novationIn of Effects .,L Alpkan .,K Kilic and .,G lusoy .,G Gundy 7.
2011. 662-676, 133,
.Indust ,growth firm of stage embryonic the at formanceper business and orientation entrepreneurial between shiprelation the Deconstructing .,E.R Morgan and .M Hughes 8.
2007. 651-661, 36, .,Manage .Market
Krishnaswamy and .,M Mathirajan .,B.H.M Subrahmanya 9.
SME for innovation technological of Importance .,N.K
2010. ,Research Economics opmentDevel for Institute World ,)India from Evidence (growth
the innovation is :performance organisational and tionorienta Market .,K.R Srivastava and .,N Kim .,K.J Han 10.
30-45,1998. 62, .,Market .J ,?link missing
.J .Int ,performance market s’firm a affect that decis ingmanufactur infrastructural intermediate Assessing .,L Li 11.
2005. 2537-2551, 43, .,Res .Prod
of Impacts Performance Financial .,C Bulut and .B Aktan 12.
Case A :Markets Emerging in Entrepreneurship Corporate
69-78, 12, .Sci .Administ Finance ..,Econ .J .Eur ,Turkey of
,Performance Firm and Capabilities Innovation nologicalTech .,Y.P.E Tang and .,W Lo .,W.K.A .Lau .,M.C.R Yam 13.
2010. 1056-1064, 4, .,Innovat .Res .Sci .Scholar .Int
.Manage .Ind ,Model A :Growth Firm and trapreneurshipIn ,Satisfaction Employee .,B Atoncic and .A.J Atoncic 14.
2011. 589-607, 111, .,Syst Data
Impact The .,B.F san .,A ,Bayrakdaroglu .,K ,Karacaoglu 15.
.Int ,firms exchange stock Istanbul from evidence :manceperfor financial’ firms on entrepreneurship corporate of
2013. 163-175, 6, .,Res .Bus
.,M Nasir and .,M Zadeh Nayeb .,H Dehnavi Dehghan 16.
,innovation ,orientation market between relationship The
,industry textile the in performance and strategy business
Arid in Development Sustainable on Conference National
2013. ,Iran ,arid-Semi and
,Paris ,Data Innovation Technological Interpreting and ingCollect for Guidelines Proposed :Manual Oslo ,OECD 17.
38, .,Res .Market .J ,others than successful more are uctsprod new some Why .,M.D Szymanski and .H.D Henard 18.